No detectable resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate after 6 years of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

UNLABELLED: One major challenge in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B is to maintain long-term viral suppression without promoting the selection of drug-resistant mutations. We analyzed data from 347 hepatitis B e antigen-negative and 238 hepatitis B e antigen positive patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in an open-label, longterm extension of two phase 3 studies. To date, resistance analyses have been completed for patients receiving up to 288 weeks (6 years) of TDF. Population sequencing of hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase/reverse transcriptase (pol/RT) was attempted for all patients at baseline, and any patient who remained viremic (HBV DNA 400 copies/mL [69 IU/mL]) at week 288 or at the end of treatment with TDF (n552) or emtricitabine(FTC)/TDF (n57). Phenotypic analyses were performed in HepG2 cells using recombinant HBV containing patient pol/RT sequences. Approximately half of the patients on open-label treatment who qualified for genotyping had pol/RT sequence changes compared to baseline (23/52 [44%] on TDF, 4/7 [57%] on FTC/TDF). Most changes were at polymorphic sites and none were associated with TDF resistance. Virologic breakthrough occurred infrequently and was associated with nonadherence to study medication in the majority of cases (12/16, 75%). Per protocol, 57 patients (10%)were eligible to switch to FTC/TDF; the majority had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL at their last study visit regardless of whether they switched to FTC/TDF (n534) or maintained TDF monotherapy (n517). No patient exhibited persistent viremia (HBV DNA never <400 copies/mL) after week 240. CONCLUSION: TDF monotherapy maintains effective suppression of HBV DNA through 288 weeks of treatment with no evidence of TDF resistance.

Evaluation of anti-HBV drug resistant mutations among patients with acute symptomatic hepatitis B in the United States.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reported HBV drug resistance mutations among previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis B are variable. Whether resistant HBV strains are transmitted in the acute setting is uncertain. We sought to document the presence of antiviral resistance (AVR) mutations in patients with acute HBV (AHB) infection. METHODS: AHB infection was defined by HBsAg/IgM anti-HBc positivity, ALT>10X ULN and compatible clinical history. The TRUGENE HBV kit was used to perform genotyping and direct sequencing of the viral polymerase. INNO-LiPA HBV DRv2 and DRv3 were used to detect AVR mutations. Clonal sequencing was conducted on selected specimens. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were evaluated (mean age, 43 years; 54% male; 39% African American, 39% Caucasian, 13% Hispanic and 4% Asian). The mean peak ALT was 1554.2IU/L and mean peak total serum bilirubin was 12 mg/dl. The HBV DNA median viral load (N = 15) was 5.14 log(10)IU/ml. Nineteen patients were genotype A, and 1 each were genotype C, D, E and G. HBV drug resistance mutations were not detected by direct sequencing or INNO-LiPA. Clonal sequencing was conducted on 192 clones isolated from three patients and showed rtA181T, rtM250V and rtS202G mutations at an overall frequency of 1.54%, 1.39%, and 1.67% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We detected adefovir/lamivudine and entecavir relevant mutations in a minor population (<2%) of viral clones by clonal sequencing only. The clinical significance of these mutations is uncertain and may represent small populations of quasi-species vs. transmission of drug resistant strains.

No resistance to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate detected after up to 144 weeks of therapy in patients monoinfected with chronic hepatitis B virus.

UNLABELLED: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a nucleotide analogue with potent activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and hepatitis B virus (HBV). To date, no reports of HBV clinical resistance to TDF have been confirmed. In two phase 3 studies (GS-US-174-0102 and GS-US-174-0103), 375 hepatitis B e antigen-negative (HBeAg(-) ) patients and 266 HBeAg(+) patients with chronic hepatitis B (some nucleoside-naive and some lamivudine-experienced) were randomized 2:1 to receive TDF (n = 426) or adefovir dipivoxil (ADV; n = 215) for 48 weeks. After week 48, eligible patients received open-label TDF with no interruption. The studies are being continued through week 384/year 8; week 144 data are presented here. Per protocol, viremic patients (HBV DNA level ≥ 400 copies/mL or 69 IU/mL) had the option of adding emtricitabine (FTC) at or after week 72. Resistance analyses of HBV polymerase/reverse transcriptase (pol/RT) were based on population dideoxy sequencing. Phenotypic analyses were conducted in HepG2 cells with recombinant HBV derived from patient serum. Most patients maintained TDF monotherapy treatment across both studies (607/641, 95%). A resistance analysis of HBV pol/RT was performed at the baseline for all patients, for viremic patients at week 144 or at the last time when they were on TDF monotherapy (34 on TDF and 19 on ADV-TDF), and for patients who remained viremic after the addition of FTC (7/20 on TDF and 5/14 on ADV-TDF). No patient developed amino acid substitutions associated with resistance to TDF. Virological breakthrough on TDF monotherapy was infrequent over 144 weeks (13/426, 3%) and was attributed to documented nonadherence in most cases (11/13, 85%). Persistent viremia (≥400 copies/mL) through week 144 was rare (5/641, 0.8%) and was not associated with virological resistance to TDF by population or clonal analyses. CONCLUSION: No nucleoside-naive or nucleoside-experienced patient developed HBV pol/RT mutations associated with TDF resistance after up to 144 weeks of exposure to TDF monotherapy.

Three-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a nucleotide analogue and potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase, showed superior efficacy to adefovir dipivoxil in treatment of chronic hepatitis B through 48 weeks. We evaluated long-term efficacy and safety of TDF monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B who were positive or negative for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg(+) or HBeAg(-)). METHODS: After 48 weeks of double-blind comparison of TDF to adefovir dipivoxil, patients who underwent liver biopsy were eligible to continue the study on open-label TDF for 7 additional years; data presented were collected up to 3 years (week 144) from 85% of participants. Primary efficacy end points at week 144 included levels of HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase, development of resistance mutations, and presence of HBeAg or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). RESULTS: At week 144, 87% of HBeAg(-) and 72% of HBeAg(+) patients treated with TDF had levels of HBV DNA <400 copies/mL. Among patients who had previously received adefovir dipivoxil and then received TDF, 88% of the HBeAg(-) and 71% of the HBeAg(+) patients had levels of HBV DNA <400 copies/mL; overall, 81% and 74%, respectively, maintained normalized levels of alanine aminotransferase and 34% had lost HBeAg. Amino acid substitutions in HBV DNA polymerase that are associated with resistance to tenofovir were not detected in any patient. Cumulatively, 8% of HBeAg(+) patients lost HBsAg. TDF maintained a favorable safety profile for up to 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: TDF was safe and effective in the long-term management of HBeAg(+) and HBeAg(-) patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Tenofovir is effective alone or with emtricitabine in adefovir-treated patients with chronic-hepatitis B virus infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We compared treatments for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who had an incomplete response to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). We evaluated a combination of fixed-dose emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) from the start (early combination) versus TDF as monotherapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 105) were randomly assigned to groups given TDF (n = 53) or FTC/TDF (n = 52). End points included HBV DNA suppression, biochemical and serologic response, and response by baseline or developed resistance mutations through 48 weeks of treatment. Patients given TDF monotherapy had the option to receive FTC, as fixed-dose FTC/TDF, if viremia persisted after week 24. RESULTS: At baseline, patients' mean HBV DNA level was 5.97 log(10) copies/mL, and 58% had received lamivudine (LAM); LAM- and ADV-associated mutations were detected in 13 and 10 patients, respectively, by population sequencing and in 14 and 18 patients, respectively, by reverse hybridization line probe assay (INNO-LiPA HBV DR). Through week 24 (direct comparison of blinded therapy), viral decay curves were identical between groups. At week 48, 81% of patients initially given TDF or TDF/FTC had HBV DNA levels below 400 copies/mL. The presence of baseline LAM- or ADV-associated mutations did not affect response. Adherence to therapy appeared to be the primary factor associated with HBV DNA levels below 400 copies/mL at week 48. CONCLUSIONS: TDF monotherapy and the combination of FTC and TDF had similar efficacy in patients with incomplete viral suppression after therapy with ADV; response was not influenced by the presence of baseline LAM- or ADV-associated mutations. Initial monotherapy followed by combination therapy was as effective as early combination therapy.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) is a nucleotide analogue and a potent inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase and hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase. METHODS: In two double-blind, phase 3 studies, we randomly assigned patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative or HBeAg-positive chronic HBV infection to receive tenofovir DF or adefovir dipivoxil (ratio, 2:1) once daily for 48 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a plasma HBV DNA level of less than 400 copies per milliliter (69 IU per milliliter) and histologic improvement (i.e., a reduction in the Knodell necroinflammation score of 2 or more points without worsening fibrosis) at week 48. Secondary end points included viral suppression (i.e., an HBV DNA level of <400 copies per milliliter), histologic improvement, serologic response, normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels, and development of resistance mutations. RESULTS: At week 48, in both studies, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving tenofovir DF than of those receiving adefovir dipivoxil had reached the primary end point (P<0.001). Viral suppression occurred in more HBeAg-negative patients receiving tenofovir DF than patients receiving adefovir dipivoxil (93% vs. 63%, P<0.001) and in more HBeAg-positive patients receiving tenofovir DF than patients receiving adefovir dipivoxil (76% vs. 13%, P<0.001). Significantly more HBeAg-positive patients treated with tenofovir DF than those treated with adefovir dipivoxil had normalized alanine aminotransferase levels (68% vs. 54%, P=0.03) and loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (3% vs. 0%, P=0.02). At week 48, amino acid substitutions within HBV DNA polymerase associated with phenotypic resistance to tenofovir DF or other drugs to treat HBV infection had not developed in any of the patients. Tenofovir DF produced a similar HBV DNA response in patients who had previously received lamivudine and in those who had not. The safety profile was similar for the two treatments in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic HBV infection, tenofovir DF at a daily dose of 300 mg had superior antiviral efficacy with a similar safety profile as compared with adefovir dipivoxil at a daily dose of 10 mg through week 48. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00116805 and NCT00117676.)

Sustained hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in patients with chronic hepatitis B after adefovir dipivoxil treatment: analysis of precore and basal core promoter mutants.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the persistence of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion (which is considered to be an important therapeutic end point) after adefovir dipivoxil treatment. METHODS: Forty-five patients who experienced confirmed HBeAg seroconversion and had a serum hepatitis B virus DNA level < 10(5) copies/mL while receiving 10 mg of adefovir dipivoxil in a prior study were enrolled in the present study. At the time of the last dose of adefovir dipivoxil (baseline), the median age of the patients was 35 years, 64% were male, 73% were Asian, 27% were white, the median alanine aminotransferase level was 25 IU/L, and the median serum hepatitis B virus DNA level was 3.0 log copies/mL. The median follow-up time was 150 weeks (range, 13-252 weeks). RESULTS: Forty-one patients maintained sustained seroconversion at the last 2 assessments, and 4 experienced seroreversion at weeks 12 (3 patients) and 16 (1 patient) of follow-up. Approximately 50% of patients had a hepatitis B virus DNA level < 1000 copies/mL at the last visit of the study period. Of 13 patients who were viremic and had available samples at the last visit, 11 had basal core promoter and/or precore mutations. Notably, 8 of these 11 patients had basal core promoter and/or precore mutations before adefovir dipivoxil therapy despite being HBeAg positive. The median duration of adefovir dipivoxil treatment was shorter before seroconversion (48 vs. 108 weeks; P = .03) and longer after seroconversion (41 vs. 22 weeks; P = .02) for patients who experienced sustained seroconversion, compared with the patients who experienced seroreversion. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged adefovir dipivoxil therapy after HBeAg seroconversion appeared to increase the likelihood of sustained HBeAg seroconversion. Most patients who experienced HBeAg seroconversion and had viremia had precore and/or basal core promoter mutants, which usually existed before initiation of adefovir dipivoxil therapy.

In vitro drug susceptibility analysis of hepatitis B virus clinical quasispecies populations.

Analysis of the replication and drug resistance of patient serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) populations can contribute to the therapeutic management of chronic hepatitis B. We developed a procedure for cloning serum HBV quasispecies populations and for phenotypic analysis of the cloned populations for in vitro drug susceptibility. Equivalent sequences were compared to the respective serum HBV DNAs of the cloned quasispecies by population sequencing. Analysis of individual clones revealed that each population contained a diversity of HBV quasispecies. Furthermore, secreted HBV in the supernatant following transfection of the quasispecies populations remained mostly unchanged from the respective input populations. HBV obtained from patients who had developed resistance to adefovir or lamivudine, as demonstrated by development of the rtA181V or rtL180M/M204V mutations in HBV polymerase, respectively, were tested. Phenotypic analysis demonstrated that a population containing the HBV rtA181V mutation showed a 2.9-fold increase in the 50% effective concentration (EC(50)) for adefovir compared to the wild-type baseline isolate, while the lamivudine-resistant HBV quasispecies population showed a >1,000-fold increase in the lamivudine EC(50). In summary, a strategy of cloning full genome HBV quasispecies populations from patient sera was developed, which could provide a useful tool in clinical HBV drug resistance phenotyping and studies of the evolution of clinical viral species.